Working with OCD & Health Anxiety: What Therapists Need to Know

1. Introduction: Two Presentations That Demand Specialist Understanding 

Few presentations test the limits of generalist therapeutic training quite as reliably as OCD and Health Anxiety. Both are conditions that, on the surface, can appear to be forms of ordinary worry or anxiety, and both are, with frustrating regularity, addressed as such by practitioners who have not had the opportunity to develop specialist competence in their formulation and treatment. The consequences are significant: clients who may have been struggling for years receive further years of insufficiently targeted therapy, often leaving treatment with the added burden of feeling that they are treatment resistant, rather than simply treatment mismatched. 

Ireland’s nationally representative mental health study, conducted in collaboration between Maynooth University, the National College of Ireland, and Trinity College Dublin, found that OCD had one of the highest prevalence rates of any mental health disorder, with 11.9 per cent of the adult population screening positive using the OCI R. This places OCD among the four most prevalent mental health conditions in Ireland, alongside insomnia disorder, avoidant personality disorder, and major depressive disorder. Globally, OCD is ranked as the fourth most common mental health disorder. In terms of clinical burden, it is striking that despite its prevalence, OCD remains chronically under identified in primary care settings: a survey of GPs found that over 50 per cent of vignettes depicting common OCD subtypes were misdiagnosed, with obsessions involving aggression, sexuality, and harm themes being the most frequently misidentified. 

Health Anxiety, now formalised in DSM 5 as Illness Anxiety Disorder (with Somatic Symptom Disorder as a closely related category), presents its own unique clinical challenges. Research suggests that between 3.4 and 20 per cent of patients presenting in medical outpatient clinics have clinically significant health anxiety, and there is robust evidence that its prevalence has increased substantially over time, driven in part by digital health information seeking behaviour (‘cyberchondria’). A landmark longitudinal study found that health anxiety prevalence in medical outpatient settings rose from 14.9 per cent in 2006–2008 to 19.9 per cent in 2008–2010, a trend that has almost certainly continued upward in the post pandemic period. 

For therapists working across Ireland and Europe in 2026, the likelihood of encountering either or both of these presentations in clinical practice is high. This article provides the foundational clinical knowledge required to understand them, and makes the case for why specialist training in their evidence based treatment is one of the most important investments a practitioner can make. 

The most common reason therapy fails people with OCD is not that evidence based treatment doesn’t work, it is that the client never received it. Over a decade can pass between OCD onset and effective treatment. Therapist knowledge is the critical variable. 

2. Understanding OCD: Phenomenology, Subtypes, and Misdiagnosis 

2.1 What OCD Is, and Is Not 

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder is characterised by the presence of obsessions, unwanted, intrusive, ego dystonic thoughts, images, or urges that provoke significant distress, and compulsions: repetitive mental or behavioural acts performed to reduce the anxiety generated by those obsessions, or to prevent a feared outcome. The critical diagnostic distinction is the ego dystonic quality of OCD symptoms: unlike delusional thinking, the person with OCD typically recognises that their obsessions are generated by their own mind and are excessive or unreasonable, yet experiences them as disturbingly real nonetheless. 

A common and clinically harmful misconception is that OCD is primarily a condition of checking, cleaning, and ordering. While these are among the most visible presentations, OCD’s range of subtypes is considerably broader, and the less visible presentations are the ones most often missed: 

• Contamination OCD: Fear of contamination from germs, chemicals, dirt, or imagined toxins, leading to washing, cleaning, and avoidance compulsions. 

• Harm OCD: Intrusive thoughts about harming oneself or others, not indicative of intent, but experienced as deeply distressing and morally unacceptable. Often misdiagnosed as violent ideation or suicidality. 

• Pure O (Primarily Obsessional OCD): OCD in which compulsions are predominantly mental, rumination, mental reviewing, mental reassurance seeking, rather than overt behavioural rituals. Frequently overlooked because there is nothing obviously ‘OCD’ to observe. 

• Religious/Scrupulosity OCD: Obsessions about sin, blasphemy, moral failure, and unworthiness, driving prayer rituals, confession seeking, and avoidance of religious material. 

• Relationship OCD (ROCD): Obsessions about the ‘rightness’ of a relationship, attraction to others, or one’s own sexuality, generating constant self scrutiny and reassurance seeking. 

• Sexual Orientation OCD (SO OCD): Intrusive doubts about one’s sexual orientation that are ego dystonic and unwanted, often leading to significant shame and avoidance. 

• Health Related OCD: Distinct from Health Anxiety (see Section 3), health related OCD involves contamination fears or specific magical thinking about illness, driven by obsessional intrusions rather than health monitoring per se. 

• Perinatal OCD: Intrusive thoughts about harming an infant, typically among new parents who find these thoughts deeply distressing and abhorrent. Frequently misdiagnosed as postpartum psychosis or a risk indicator, when in fact it is a treatable anxiety disorder. 

2.2 The Neuroscience of OCD 

Contemporary neuroscience conceptualises OCD as a disorder of cortico striato thalamo cortical (CSTC) circuitry, a looping neural network that, in OCD, appears to generate an error signal that is not adequately inhibited. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) generate alarm signals in response to perceived threat or error; in OCD, these signals are amplified and poorly regulated, creating the subjective experience of urgency, discomfort, and the feeling that something is ‘not right’ that drives compulsive behaviour. Compulsions provide temporary relief, but they reinforce the loop, each ritual confirming to the brain that the original threat signal was valid. 

This neurobiological model has direct therapeutic implications. It explains why insight and reassurance, the stock tools of non specialist therapeutic work, are insufficient and in fact counterproductive in OCD. Providing reassurance confirms the threat signal. Discussing the irrationality of obsessional thoughts engages the very rumination that maintains the disorder. The treatment approach that directly targets this neural loop, and that is recommended as first line by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the American Psychiatric Association, and Ireland’s own HSE guidelines, is Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP). 

2.3 The Diagnostic Challenge: Why OCD Is So Often Missed 

There is a well documented gap of between 10 and 17 years between OCD symptom onset and the initiation of effective treatment. This extraordinary delay reflects a convergence of factors: stigma that prevents disclosure, cultural and religious contexts that frame OCD symptoms as moral failures rather than medical conditions, the invisibility of mental compulsions and Pure O presentations, and, critically for the purposes of this article, the limited OCD specific training available to the generalist mental health workforce. 

In Irish primary care, the most commonly correctly identified OCD presentations are contamination and symmetry obsessions. Presentations involving aggression, harm, and sexuality are systematically misidentified, sometimes as genuine risk, sometimes as a different anxiety disorder, sometimes as personality pathology. The consequence of misdiagnosis is not merely delayed effective treatment. It includes well meaning interventions that actively worsen OCD: exploratory work that reinforces rumination, cognitive work focused on thought content rather than the response to thoughts, and therapeutic reassurance that fuels the reassurance seeking compulsion. 

In OCD, the therapeutic instinct to reassure, to explore meaning, and to discuss the content of intrusive thoughts is precisely what must be unlearned. ERP asks therapists and clients alike to do the counterintuitive, to approach rather than avoid, and to resist the urge to resolve the discomfort. 

3. Understanding Health Anxiety: The Post Pandemic Landscape 

3.1 Clinical Conceptualisation 

Health Anxiety, classified in DSM 5 as Illness Anxiety Disorder (IAD), with Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) as a closely related category, is characterised by persistent and disproportionate preoccupation with having or acquiring a serious medical condition, in the absence of medical pathology sufficient to account for the level of distress or disability. The Salkovskis cognitive behavioural model of health anxiety, which has been the foundation for most evidence based treatment development in the field, identifies four core maintenance processes: misinterpretation of bodily sensations and symptoms as indicators of serious disease; selective attention to health relevant information; safety behaviours (checking, reassurance seeking, medical consultation) that provide temporary relief but maintain the threat appraisal; and thought action fusion, the belief that thinking about an illness increases the likelihood of having it. 

A fifth maintenance process has been identified with increasing prominence in the post COVID era: cyberchondria, the use of internet health searches as a form of reassurance seeking that escalates rather than reduces anxiety. A 2026 scoping review of 41 studies from 2015 to 2024 confirmed that cyberchondria is significantly associated with health anxiety and is mediated by difficulties in emotion regulation. Research demonstrates consistently that anxiety and pessimism amplify the relationship between health anxiety and cyberchondria, creating a digital maintenance loop that was structurally impossible prior to the internet age and that accelerated dramatically during the COVID 19 pandemic, when health information seeking was simultaneously encouraged and anxiety inducing. 

3.2 The COVID 19 Effect 

The COVID 19 pandemic represented an unprecedented public health context for health anxiety specifically. A systematic review and meta analysis published in PLOS Mental Health (2024) synthesised 12 studies using the Short Health Anxiety Inventory 18 during the pandemic, finding elevated health anxiety scores across all populations studied, with significantly higher levels among females, unmarried individuals, and those with pre existing health conditions. The pandemic normalised health monitoring behaviours, temperature checking, symptom tracking, prolonged mask wearing, and medical information seeking, many of which precisely overlap with the behavioural profiles of health anxiety. 

For the Irish population specifically, the pandemic intersected with an already high base rate of anxiety, a strained public healthcare system, and a cultural context in which presenting with physical health concerns carries significantly less stigma than presenting with mental health concerns. The result, in clinical terms, is a cohort of clients for whom health anxiety has been significantly reinforced, sometimes in ways that they do not recognise as psychological, presenting instead with a clear expectation of medical investigation, diagnosis, and reassurance. 

3.3 Distinguishing Health Anxiety from OCD and Other Presentations 

The differential diagnosis between Health Anxiety, health related OCD, Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Somatic Symptom Disorder, and Illness Anxiety Disorder requires careful assessment and a nuanced clinical understanding of each presentation. The following distinctions are clinically important for practitioners: 

• Health Anxiety (IAD) vs Health Related OCD: In IAD, the primary fear is of having or contracting a serious illness, and safety behaviours centre on medical reassurance and symptom checking. In health related OCD, the presentation typically involves contamination fears or magical thinking about illness causation, with more classic intrusive thought content and compulsive responding. 

• Health Anxiety vs GAD: GAD involves pervasive worry across multiple domains; health anxiety is primarily focused on health and illness. GAD clients typically worry about a range of outcomes; health anxiety clients often have a specific illness or illness category as their central preoccupation. 

• IAD vs Somatic Symptom Disorder: IAD is characterised by relatively low somatic symptom burden with high illness preoccupation. SSD involves significant somatic symptoms (pain, fatigue, gastrointestinal distress) that the person finds highly distressing and attributable to serious illness. 

4. The Evidence Base: What Works and Why 

4.1 Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) for OCD 

ERP is the most extensively evidenced psychological treatment in the OCD literature, and is designated first line psychotherapy for OCD by NICE (UK), the APA (US), and Ireland’s own HSE clinical guidance. Developed by Victor Meyer in 1966, ERP is a form of CBT that involves two core components: planned, graduated exposure to the situations, thoughts, or objects that trigger obsessional distress (exposure), and the deliberate, supported restraint from performing the compulsive response (response prevention). The theoretical basis rests on inhibitory learning theory and extinction: by remaining in contact with the feared stimulus without performing the compulsion, the person learns that the anticipated catastrophe does not occur, and the anxiety habituates over time. 

A comprehensive meta analysis published in Behaviour Research and Therapy (Reid et al., 2021), synthesising 36 randomised controlled trials involving 2,020 patients, found a large effect size (g = 1.13) for CBT with ERP compared to psychological placebo. A separate meta analysis (Zhang et al., 2022) examined 30 studies of ERP across 39 RCTs with 1,793 participants, confirming ERP’s definite effect on OCD (g = 0.37), with its effect especially pronounced when compared to placebo conditions (g = 0.97). For children and adolescents, a 2025 network meta analysis in Pediatrics, drawing on 71 RCTs, confirmed ERP as more effective than waitlist (NMD = −10.5) and broadly equivalent to remote ERP, establishing telehealth delivery as a clinically valid option. 

Critically, a large scale retrospective longitudinal study of video teletherapy ERP (JMIR, 2022), involving over 3,000 participants, one to two orders of magnitude larger than most ERP clinical trials, found a large effect size (g = 1.0) for OCD symptom reduction, a 43.4 per cent mean reduction in OCD symptoms, a 62.9 per cent response rate, and sustained gains at 12 month follow up. These real world findings confirm that ERP’s efficacy in research settings translates to clinical practice, when delivered competently. 

The evidence also supports combined ERP and pharmacotherapy (SSRIs) as superior to either treatment alone for moderate to severe OCD, with subgroup analyses confirming combined treatment as especially effective when SSRI monotherapy has provided insufficient relief. 

g = 1.13, Effect size for CBT/ERP vs. placebo in OCD (Reid et al., 2021, 36 RCTs, N=2,020) 

62.9%, Response rate achieved in large scale real world ERP delivery (JMIR, 2022) 

10–17 yrs, Average gap between OCD onset and effective treatment initiation 

11.9%, Prevalence of OCD among Irish adults, one of the four highest prevalence disorders in Ireland 

4.2 Why Standard Talk Therapy Is Insufficient for OCD 

Perhaps the most important clinical knowledge a therapist can bring to OCD work is an understanding of what does not work, and why. Non specialist therapeutic approaches commonly applied to OCD include: exploratory counselling seeking to understand the ‘meaning’ of intrusive thoughts; reassurance based support designed to address catastrophic cognitions; mindfulness interventions delivered without OCD specific adaptations; and insight oriented approaches aiming to resolve underlying issues. These approaches are not merely ineffective for OCD, they can actively reinforce the condition. 

Reassurance, whether provided by the therapist or sought by the client, directly activates the compulsive relief mechanism that maintains OCD. Exploring the meaning of intrusive thoughts engages the ruminative process that fuels them. Insight oriented work can become a form of mental compulsion, a cognitive ritual in which the client attempts to ‘figure out’ why they have these thoughts, generating temporary relief through the illusion of resolution. ERP works precisely because it does the opposite: it directs the person to remain in contact with the thought, the anxiety, and the uncertainty, and to resist all attempts at relief, until the anxiety habituates and the inhibitory learning can occur. 

4.3 Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Health Anxiety 

The evidence base for CBT in Health Anxiety is robust. A systematic review and meta analysis (Hedman Lagerlöf et al., 2019) synthesising 19 RCTs found a moderate to large pooled effect size (g = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.57–1.01) for CBT versus control conditions, with effects sustained at 12–18 month follow up. Response and remission rates were clinically meaningful, and the review confirmed that internet delivered CBT (iCBT) produced outcomes comparable to face to face delivery, a finding with significant implications for access to treatment across Ireland and Europe. 

The Salkovskis CBT model for health anxiety addresses the four maintenance processes directly: challenging illness appraisals through cognitive restructuring; conducting behavioural experiments to test illness beliefs against evidence; eliminating safety behaviours and reassurance seeking; and developing attentional flexibility to reduce the hypervigilance to bodily sensation that sustains the disorder. NICE designates CBT as the recommended treatment of choice for health anxiety, and this recommendation is replicated in the WHO’s updated 2023 Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) guidelines, which call for CBT based psychological interventions to be offered across a variety of formats including online and group delivery. 

For cyberchondria specifically, the literature identifies health literacy as a significant protective factor, consistent with the clinical recommendation to incorporate psychoeducation about how health information on the internet is structured, how probability and risk are represented, and how the search process itself reinforces anxiety. 

4.4 Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) as Adjunct 

ACT is increasingly integrated alongside both ERP for OCD and CBT for health anxiety, providing a framework for developing psychological flexibility with respect to intrusive thoughts, bodily sensations, and uncertainty. In OCD treatment, ACT components, particularly defusion (distancing from the literal content of thoughts) and acceptance (willingness to experience anxiety without struggle), complement the response prevention component of ERP by reducing the experiential avoidance that makes it so difficult for clients to tolerate uncertainty without ritualising. 

In health anxiety, ACT’s values clarification work is particularly relevant: many health anxiety clients have progressively narrowed their lives around illness avoidance and medical consultation, and re engaging with valued activities despite health fears is a central dimension of recovery. A values based approach provides motivational scaffolding for the difficult behavioural experiments and exposure tasks that CBT requires. 

5. The Clinical Skills Required: What Therapist Training Must Address 

5.1 Accurate Assessment and Differential Diagnosis 

Effective work with OCD and Health Anxiety begins with accurate identification. For OCD, this requires familiarity with the full range of OCD subtypes, including the less visible presentations described in Section 2. It requires understanding of the ego dystonic quality of OCD symptoms and the ability to distinguish between OCD intrusive thoughts and ego syntonic violent or sexual ideation. It requires skilled use of validated instruments such as the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y BOCS) and the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory Revised (OCI R). And it requires, above all, a clinical stance of non reactivity to the content of intrusive thoughts, an ability to hear disclosures about harm obsessions, sexual intrusions, and blasphemous thoughts without conveying alarm or moral censure, which are among the most powerful shame maintaining responses a therapist can inadvertently produce. 

For Health Anxiety, assessment must distinguish between IAD, SSD, health related OCD, GAD, and presentations where legitimate health concerns are complicating the picture. Validated tools including the Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI) provide a standardised baseline; clinical interview should explore the nature of safety behaviours, the pattern of internet searching, and the degree to which health preoccupation has narrowed daily functioning and life engagement. 

5.2 Formulation Driven Treatment Planning 

Both OCD and Health Anxiety respond well to structured, formulation driven treatment. For OCD, a functional analysis of the obsession compulsion cycle, mapping specific triggers, obsessional content, emotion, compulsion, and short term and long term consequences, provides the foundation for building an individualised ERP hierarchy. This hierarchy (sometimes called a ‘fear ladder’) ranks exposure tasks from least to most distressing, allowing the client to begin practising response prevention at a level that is challenging but manageable, and to build skill and confidence incrementally. 

For Health Anxiety, a shared formulation using the Salkovskis model communicates to the client, often for the first time, why they feel the way they do and why their safety behaviours are maintaining rather than resolving their distress. This psychoeducational dimension of formulation is itself therapeutic: many health anxiety clients have spent years seeking medical reassurance and receiving either clean bills of health (temporarily reassuring, quickly re entered) or diagnoses that feel insufficient explanations for their suffering. Understanding the psychological mechanism of health anxiety can provide profound relief and dramatically enhance treatment engagement. 

5.3 Managing the Therapeutic Relationship in OCD and Health Anxiety 

The therapeutic relationship in OCD and Health Anxiety work requires specific competencies that differ in important ways from generalist therapeutic practice. Therapists must be able to hold a non reassuring stance with warmth, to resist the entirely natural human impulse to provide comfort to a distressed client when that comfort is precisely what maintains the disorder. This requires robust clinical rationale, clear and compassionate psychoeducation about why response prevention is necessary, and the therapist’s own psychological flexibility about working with uncertainty. 

For Health Anxiety clients, the therapist must also navigate the medical/psychological interface with skill, maintaining credibility with clients who may be attached to a medical explanation for their suffering, and who may experience a psychological conceptualisation as invalidating or dismissive. The clinical skill of holding both medical seriousness and psychological mechanism together, acknowledging that bodily symptoms are real, while contextualising them within a psychological maintenance model, is a trainable competency that substantially affects treatment engagement and outcome. 

The most important thing a therapist can learn about OCD is this: you cannot think your way out of OCD. What changes the brain is behaviour, specifically, the behaviour of not engaging in the compulsion. Understanding this at a deep level is what enables a therapist to guide a client through the discomfort with genuine conviction. 

6. The Irish and European Context: Why This Matters Now 

6.1 Prevalence and Burden 

Ireland’s nationally representative data places OCD among the four most prevalent mental health conditions in the adult population, with a screening prevalence of 11.9 per cent. The lifetime prevalence of OCD in European countries ranges from 0.1 to 2.3 per cent using diagnostic criteria, with higher figures when sub threshold presentations are included. OCD is globally the fourth most common mental disorder and is associated with among the highest disability adjusted life years (DALYs) of any anxiety related condition. Approximately two thirds of adults with OCD have at least one co occurring mental health condition, with major depressive disorder present in approximately 50 per cent of cases. 

For Health Anxiety, the prevalence data is similarly concerning. Between 3.4 and 20 per cent of individuals presenting in medical outpatient settings have clinically significant health anxiety, a figure that translates to enormous personal distress and substantial unnecessary healthcare utilisation. The WHO’s updated 2023 mhGAP guidelines recognise the scale of the challenge, dedicating a new standalone module to anxiety disorders in recognition of increased global prevalence, and calling explicitly for CBT based psychological interventions to be made available at scale. 

The European mental health context further amplifies these concerns. Across the EU, one in four adults reports barriers to accessing mental health care, including long waiting times and high costs. The WHO European Region’s Mental Health Atlas 2024 identifies a critical shortage of specialist mental health practitioners. For Ireland specifically, the HSE spent approximately €93 million outsourcing mental health care to private providers in 2024, a figure that reflects persistent systemic capacity shortfalls, and one that underlines the irreplaceable value of well trained therapists in the private and voluntary sectors. 

6.2 The Treatment Gap and the Therapist’s Role 

Despite the existence of effective treatments for both OCD and Health Anxiety, access to those treatments in Ireland and across Europe remains deeply inadequate. For OCD, the 10–17 year treatment gap is not primarily a reflection of client reluctance to engage, but of systemic failure to provide ERP competent practitioners in sufficient numbers. The specialist ERP workforce in Ireland remains small and concentrated in a limited number of urban settings. OCD Ireland, the national peer support and advocacy organisation, explicitly advises individuals seeking treatment to ensure their therapist has at least two to three years of training in CBT and membership of the BABCP or CBTI, noting that many practitioners advertising OCD treatment do not meet this standard. 

For Health Anxiety, the challenge is compounded by the fact that a significant proportion of affected individuals are not in mental health settings at all, they are in GP surgeries, cardiology clinics, gastrointestinal services, and medical outpatient departments, consuming healthcare resources that are not, in the long run, addressing their actual condition. The research to practice gap for Health Anxiety interventions is widely noted in the literature, with factors including limited access to CBT trained clinicians identified as a primary barrier. 

This gap represents a significant professional opportunity for therapists who invest in specialist training. In a therapeutic marketplace where demand for OCD competent and Health Anxiety competent practitioners substantially exceeds supply, specialist skills are both clinically impactful and professionally differentiated. 

7. Implications for Professional Development and Training 

7.1 What Specialist Training in OCD and Health Anxiety Requires 

Developing genuine competence in working with OCD and Health Anxiety is not a matter of reading a single text or attending a one day workshop. It requires a structured learning pathway that addresses: the neuroscience and cognitive behavioural models underpinning both presentations; differential diagnostic skills and validated assessment tools; ERP protocol delivery, including hierarchy construction, exposure design, and response prevention coaching; CBT formulation and treatment delivery for Health Anxiety; the specific relational and countertransference challenges of this work; and supervised practice with appropriate case consultation. 

For therapists already working in general practice, this knowledge does not require abandoning existing modalities. The majority of effective OCD and Health Anxiety therapists integrate their existing relational, person centred, and psychodynamic understandings of the therapeutic relationship with protocol specific CBT and ERP skills. The clinical complexity of these presentations is precisely what makes them suited to therapists who combine relational depth with technical competence. 

7.2 Why Now Is the Right Time 

The convergence of factors described in this article, elevated Irish and European prevalence, a substantial treatment gap, expanding evidence base, and increasing specialist demand, makes the present moment particularly compelling for therapists considering specialist development in OCD and Health Anxiety. The post pandemic mental health landscape has produced a generation of clients with health anxiety presentations reinforced by pandemic era health monitoring, and OCD presentations complicated by contamination fears that were, during the pandemic, environmentally reinforced rather than merely intrusive. Understanding and working effectively with the intersection of these clinical realities and the underlying disorders requires exactly the specialist knowledge that structured postgraduate and professional development training provides. 

The therapist who understands OCD and Health Anxiety does not merely add two presentations to their repertoire. They acquire a clinical framework that deepens their understanding of the role of avoidance, safety behaviour, and the maintenance of anxiety in every presentation they encounter. 

8. Conclusion 

OCD and Health Anxiety are among the most prevalent, most disabling, and most systematically undertreated mental health presentations in Ireland and across Europe. The gap between the availability of effective treatments and the delivery of those treatments is among the most significant clinical challenges facing the mental health sector in 2026. Therapists who develop specialist competence in these presentations are uniquely positioned to close that gap, to offer people who have often spent many years in unhelpful treatment a genuinely transformative clinical experience. 

The knowledge required to do so is learnable. The skills are trainable. The evidence base is robust. And the need, as this article has documented, is both urgent and substantial. Specialist training in OCD and Health Anxiety is not a niche professional interest, it is a clinically necessary response to the realities of contemporary therapeutic practice in Ireland and Europe. 

Advance Your Clinical Practice with PCI College 

PCI College offers a range of professional development and postgraduate programmes designed for practising therapists and counsellors seeking to deepen their specialist clinical knowledge. Whether you are looking to develop competence in specific presentations such as OCD and anxiety disorders, or to pursue structured postgraduate level study in psychology and psychotherapy, PCI College provides academically rigorous, clinically grounded programmes aligned with the standards of the IACP, IAHIP, and PSI. 

Explore our Professional Development courses, including specialist programmes for practising therapists, at pcicollege.ie/courses/professional development/. 

Explore our Postgraduate programmes for advanced clinical and academic study at pcicollege.ie/courses/postgraduate/. 

References 

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: APA. 

Aware. (2024). Aware National Survey 2024: Depression and Anxiety in Ireland. Dublin: Aware. 

Fineberg, N. A., et al. (2021). Cognitive behavioural therapy with exposure and response prevention in the treatment of OCD: A systematic review and meta analysis of RCTs. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 106, 152223. 

Health Service Executive. (2024). Annual Report and Financial Statements 2024. Dublin: HSE. 

Hedman Lagerlöf, E., Tybrandt, G., Ljótsson, B., & Andersson, E. (2019). Cognitive behavior therapy for health anxiety: Systematic review and meta analysis of clinical efficacy and health economic outcomes. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 19(6), 663–676. 

Hezel, D. M., & Simpson, H. B. (2019). Exposure and response prevention for obsessive compulsive disorder: A review and new directions. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(Suppl 1), S85–S92. 

Hyland, P., et al. (2022). State of Ireland’s mental health: Findings from a nationally representative survey. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 31, e50. 

International OCD Foundation. (2024). Education & Training Programs with an Emphasis on OCD. Boston, MA: IOCDF. 

Miezah, D., et al. (2026). Prevalence and associated factors of cyberchondria: A scoping review. The Scientific World Journal. 

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2005, updated 2022). Obsessive compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder: Treatment. NICE Clinical Guideline CG31. London: NICE. 

OCD Ireland. (2024). Seeking Help. Retrieved from ocdireland.org/seeking help/ 

Pediatrics / American Academy of Pediatrics. (2025). Treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder in Children and Youth: A Meta Analysis. Pediatrics, 155(3), e2024068992. 

Reid, J. E., Laws, K. R., Drummond, L., Vismara, M., Grancini, B., Mpavaenda, D., & Fineberg, N. A. (2021). Cognitive behavioural therapy with exposure and response prevention in the treatment of OCD: A systematic review and meta analysis of RCTs. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 106, 152223. 

Salkovskis, P. M. (1996). The cognitive approach to anxiety: Threat beliefs, safety seeking behaviour, and the special case of health anxiety and OCD. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of Cognitive Therapy. New York: Guilford. 

Senter, M. S., Becker Haimes, E. M., & Ginsburg, G. (2020). Defining and addressing gaps in care for obsessive compulsive disorder. Psychiatric Services, 71(9), 972–979. 

St Patrick’s Mental Health Services. (2019). Diagnosis and management of obsessive compulsive disorder in primary care. Dublin: St Patrick’s. 

World Health Organization. (2023). Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Guideline, 3rd edition. Geneva: WHO. 

World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. (2024). Mental Health Atlas 2024: European Region. Geneva: WHO. 

Zhang, S., et al. (2022). The effect of exposure and response prevention therapy on OCD: A systematic review and meta analysis. Journal of Obsessive Compulsive and Related Disorders, 35, 100756. 

Zhang, X., et al. (2022). Efficacy of ERP + pharmacotherapy for OCD: A systematic review and meta analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 973838.